<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How a Sampling of Wealthy Suburbs Voted: Obama vs. McCain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://higley1000.com/archives/121/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://higley1000.com/archives/121</link>
	<description>Racial Integration in the Wealthiest 1000 Places in America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:04:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Higley</title>
		<link>http://higley1000.com/archives/121/comment-page-1#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Higley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://higley1000.com/?p=121#comment-831</guid>
		<description>The number of third party votes in the most recent election were so small that they were irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The number of third party votes in the most recent election were so small that they were irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.P.</title>
		<link>http://higley1000.com/archives/121/comment-page-1#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>J.P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://higley1000.com/?p=121#comment-818</guid>
		<description>Eliminating the third-party vote totals is completely disingenuous and undermines this site&#039;s credibility.  You need not print out their percentages, but these numbers should not all be adding up to 100%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eliminating the third-party vote totals is completely disingenuous and undermines this site&#8217;s credibility.  You need not print out their percentages, but these numbers should not all be adding up to 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank</title>
		<link>http://higley1000.com/archives/121/comment-page-1#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://higley1000.com/?p=121#comment-673</guid>
		<description>I found it very interesting that more than one in five Mountain Brook residents who voted in the election voted for Barack Obama. Okay, sure, McCain overwhelmingly dominated the votes in Mountain Brook, but I still am surprised that even 22 % voted for Obama. Mountain Brook appears to not be as conservative as I thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found it very interesting that more than one in five Mountain Brook residents who voted in the election voted for Barack Obama. Okay, sure, McCain overwhelmingly dominated the votes in Mountain Brook, but I still am surprised that even 22 % voted for Obama. Mountain Brook appears to not be as conservative as I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

